Some historiographic problems of the Hungarian history (in the context of Turkic ethnic culture)

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh.2020.v97.i2.10
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study of the ethnic history of the Hungarian people is one of the actualis suesin historicalscience.The ancient history ofthe formation of the Hungarian people as an ethnos is undoubtedly interestingfor nomadic civilization and settled nations. Their distinctive difference from other European nationsis in their deeply rooted ethnic history. If we lookin addition at the proto-Hungarian language formed1 millennium BC, then Hungarian’s historical origin dates back to 2,500 BC. Nonetheless the first truewritten sources appear in the IX century. The close connection of this ethnos, called Magyars in generalhistory, with the nomadic Kypchaks required difficult turning points in historiography. If we look at thehistory of Magyars before the IX century, we see that they need to be considered from the point of viewof a single nomadic civilization. However, historical data on the western part of the Hungarians who settledon the banks of the Danube and Tissa were preserved only in Western chronicles. And the historicaldata on eastern hordes were found in Arab and Persian sources. However, until the present time, a largeamount of data related to Hungary is composed of Western data.