Performance Comparison of single‐slope solar still loaded with various nanofluids

Energy Science & Engineering, 2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/ese3.993
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Nanofluids are great heat transfer carriers for collecting thermal energy in solar thermal applications. In the present study, a theoretical study of single‐slope solar still (passive type) has been carried out by incorporating CuO, Al2O3, Ag, Fe2O3, and SiC‐water nanofluids at different volume concentrations (0.02, 0.05, 0.08, 0.12, and 0.2). This analysis has been carried out with an optimum water depth of 0.02m as obtained from the experimental and theoretical studies. In order to validate the model, the experiments were conducted on solar still and then performance of still was compared. The analytical expression of the characteristic equation using Runga‐Kutta ODE, for passive single slope solar still was found to be in good agreement with experiments carried out in Patiala, India. The total deviation for both experimental and theoretical distillate output of a still for a day was found to be 12.24%. Daily production for Al2O3‐water‐based nanofluid was found to be (14.22%) higher than simple solar still without nanofluid, followed by CuO (10.82%), Ag (8.11%), Fe2O3 (7.63%) and SiC (7.61%).