THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL RECONCILIATION IN REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17770/acj.v4i85.4016
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Conflict as a clash of opposing interests, opinions, attitudes, goals, and positions is one of the everyday phenomena inherent in human society. It may be different depending on its scale and vary in the range from domestic quarrel to geopolitical confrontation between nuclear powers. In this case, the conflict itself, in spite of the negative attitude of narrow-minded to it, is a rather neutral phenomenon, its positive and negative effects are associated not only with the conflict itself, as to the method of its settlement. At the same time, the rational settlement of the conflict, such as through a constructive dialogue, it becomes the driving force of human progress, it helps to get the relationship on a completely different level.