Attorney's Request for Giving an Expert Opinion in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Corrections. Part 2

2016

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-3-84-91
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the second part of the article continued analysis of the stories of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, regulating the organization and production of judicial examinations attorney's request. The authors analyzed the rights and duties of experts, made a proposal to adjust the rules based lawyer request for an expert opinion. Considered the rights of the investigating judge in the appointment of judicial examination at the request of the lawyer involved in the criminal trial as an advocate, and taking into account the legal requirements of the relevant rules of the art developed. Proposed alternative language rules governing the rights and duties of the head of the body in the forensic part of the organization and production of judicial examinations attorney's request. In order to standardize a draft procedural document «Advocates' request for an expert opinion».