Every Court an Island?

2018

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.25162/medhist-2018-0013
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Histories of courtly science and medicine primarily deal with activities and events confined within the walls of the palace. In contrast, this paper highlights the interactions of court medicine with developments outside of the palace, by focusing on the case of the early modern Russian court medical department, which had a wide-range of extra-courtly duties. Western European medical practitioners working at the Russian court maintained contacts with other courts, were involved in military medicine, conducted plague autopsies, regulated the medical market, provided expert testimony in witchcraft trials, and wrote self-help medical texts for a wide range of Russians. The Russian court was not unique: in each of these areas, Russia echoed developments elsewhere in Europe. The uniqueness of the Russian case is rather in the huge breadth of these activities, making Russian court medicine a major part of early modern Russia’s medical world.