INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGNING METHOD FOR NON-CONFORMITY IDENTIFICATION IN THE PROCEDURES FOR MANAGING CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS

2018

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.24143/2072-9502-2018-2-71-80
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Management of procedures for corrective and preventive actions is one of the main tasks for enterprises in such areas as biotechnology, food and pharmaceutical production. In practice, the process of detecting and identifying nonconformities is fraught with a number of difficulties due to the random nature of their occurrence and the length of the process of identifying the sources that generate these discrepancies. There has been presented a step-by-step process of detecting and identifying inconsistencies, based on the analysis and formal description of the corrective and preventive procedures. A method for classifying messages on inconsistencies coming from various sources and machine definition of key parameters for controlling process stability has been proposed. The principle of self-development of the computer system is implemented, which allows dynamically updating key parameters and calculating their reference values on the basis of empirical data and generated scoring context-sensitive tables. In particular, data granularity indicators, such as "frequency" and "number of registrations" are considered as such parameters and a practical example with a step-by-step description of the calculation of their values is presented. An approach to the automation of computing processes is proposed, by additionally taking into account aggregated variables, which are criteria for estimating key parameters. Practical use of this method allows real-time identification of inconsistencies and promptly conducting corrective and preventive actions to eliminate detected inconsistencies.