NON-TRADITIONAL OILSEED CROPS IN THE NORTH OF KAZAKHSTAN

2017

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26898/0370-8799-2017-6-13
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Results are given from a three-year (2015–2017) study on productivity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) varieties Center 70, Akmai, Irkas and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) varieties Severnyi, Kustanaiskiy Yantar and Karabalykskaya 7 bred in Kazakhstan. Studies were conducted according to the following tillage techniques: zonal (1 subsoil tillage to the depth of 8–10 cm + 2 subsoil tillage to 10–12 cm and loosening to 25–27 cm), minimum (spraying with herbicide + 1 subsoil tillage to the depth of 8– 10 cm and direct seeding) and no-till (spraying with herbicide + direct seeding). The field experiment was conducted on dark-chestnut soils in the North Kazakhstan dry steppe (Akmolinsk Region) with a sharply continental climate. The minimal technique was found to be most effective in growing non-traditional oilseed crops. Among the safflower cultivars, Center 70 exhibited the yield by 1.3–2.7 centners per hectare higher than other cultivars; among the flax cultivars, Severnyi was remarkable for its yields of 0.5–2.8 centners per hectare higher than those of other varieties. The safflower cultivar Center 70 and flax cultivar Severnyi proved to be economically sound, when cultivated according to the minimum tillage technique, with profitability levels of 70.0–134.4 % and 122.7%, respectively, that was 5.3–45.2% and 22.4–71.9 % higher than in other cultivars.