The role of interlaboratory comparative tests/interlaboratory comparisons in the development of national, competitive products

2017

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.24027/2306-7039.1a.2017.100414
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Confidence in the quality of products, which were produced by the enterprise, is the key of success and competitiveness in the market. Confirming products’ quality and environmental security of the manufacture is impossible without a well-functioning testing and calibration laboratories, which can provide the accuracy of their results.Now, external evaluation of the laboratories’ competence by proficiency testing is one of the main instruments of development of laboratories’ activities and improving the quality of researches. Even with a perfectly functioning management system, high-precision expensive equipment and professional operators, without external evaluation laboratories can work for a long period with an offsets or significant random variations in measurement results. Only through proficiency testing, laboratories can reveal the presence of this kind of problem. Participation in Interlaboratory comparisons makes it possible to identify the "weak" sides of the laboratory operation and the successful implementation of preventive and corrective actions make them more "strong."