Research of autopersonal component of psychosocial readiness for future psychologists' activity

2015

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15405/epsbs.2015.01.20
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Interest in research of psychosocial readiness for professional activity of future psychologists is natural in the conditions of those transformations, which happen in the Kazakhstan education system today.In research we consider psychosocial readiness for professional activity of future psychologists -as the trinity of a psychophysiological state, system of professionally important personal qualities and value-semantic readiness.We analyzed 4 components of psychological readiness for professional activity (auto personal, cognitiveoperational, emotionally -strong-willed, interactive).The purpose of a research it's studying of an autopersonal component to which we referred such professionally important personal qualities.The method "The psychosocial potential of readiness for professional activity of the expert psychologist" was used.Experimental work was carried out on the basis of psychological office of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, faculty of psychology of the East Kazakhstan state university of S. Amanzholov, faculty of psychology of Turan University.As showed research, such professional and important qualities as autonomy, integration of the valuable and motivational sphere, adequacy of a self-assessment were the most developed at students.The least developed -an internality and a humanistic orientation.The differentiated analysis showed the highest level of autonomy for students of 3 courses of a correspondence department the internality is most developed at students 2 courses of a