Automation of Methods for the Subjective Measuring of Factors in the Operation of Automated Information Systems by Means of VBA

2015

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.13187/er.2015.90.26
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article describes the process of assessing the effectiveness of the operation of automated information systems in colleges using the method of pairwise comparison and discusses numerical representations used with the above method.The author lists methods for the subjective measuring of the effective operation of automated information systems.The article proposes a way to automate the methods that makes it possible to simplify performing calculations and reduce the amount of time it takes to determine the outcome of a specific task.The author provides an algorithm with the results of work carried out.