Cognitive measurements for new generation knowledge acquisition systems

2015

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icaict.2015.7338530
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The problems of developing new generation knowledge acquisition systems are faced. A crucial role of measurement in acquiring knowledge for intelligent systems is shown. A comparative analysis of classical measurements and expert estimates is made. Some nonclassical measurement concepts based on granular ontologies and measurement information granulation are presented. The classification of non-traditional measurements is given. The Russian scientific tradition of considering measurement as a cognitive process is discussed. The concept of Cognitive Measurement based on Cognitive Sensors is introduced. Here Cognitive Measurement is viewed as a two-leveled granulation process where the lower level is responsible for obtaining fine-grained data by artificial sensor system, and the higher level transforms it into coarse-grained information related to a pragmatic scale of normative linguistic values such as "norm", "nearly norm", "out of norm", "far from norm" etc. Two types of Cognitive Sensors with appropriate pragmatics are introduced. A bilattice-based interpretation of multi-sensor data fusion is proposed.