How do L1 and L2 influence on the acquisition of L3 (English) stress pattern

2015

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1121/1.4934153
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this research, we investigated the acquisition of English stress by trilingual speakers (Kazakh/Russian (L1)-Russian/Kazakh (L2)-English (L3). Stress in Kazakh, as a Turkic language, is on the final position (Johnson, 1998) and was cued by fundamental frequency (Kirghner, cited from Kondibaeva, 2010). However, in Russian, stress was cued by duration and intensity (Hamilton, 1980; Kuznetsova, 2006). In this research, we used two different trilingual groups in which the Kazakh-Russian-English trilingual group has Kazakh as a dominant language and first language; on the other hand, the Russian-Kazakh-English trilingual group has Russian as a dominant language with the advanced level of Kazakh. However, both groups have high level of English (IELTS = 6.5 and above). All participants from both groups produced the noun-verb stress pattern words in sentences. In the production of ten female speakers from each group, average fundamental frequency, duration, average intensity, and first and second formant frequencies for vowels were collected in the stressed and unstressed syllables. The result showed that for Russian-Kazakh-English speakers, duration and intensity are stronger cues than F0. Kazakh-Russian-English trilinguals used all parameters, but duration was strongly associated with final lengthening. The results will be discussed in terms of L1/L2 transfer into the acquisition of L3.