Issues of Media Democracy: On the Basis of Kazakhstan's Experience

2013

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.889
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the article authors surveyed theoretic aspects of media democracy based on semiotics, monitoring of content, factor and correlational analysis of Kazakhstan's periodical materials. It's important to mention that factor, correlational and semiotic analysis was conducted on Kazakhstan's printings for the first time. Authors offered some suggestions according to results of applied researches on materials of Kazakhstans printings and their political positions.