Abstract
In the analysis for our paper on D * production, the beauty contribution was erroneously subtracted twice in the extraction of the reduced cross sections.This affected tables 9 and 10 as well as figures 9 and 10 that are reproduced here in a corrected version.The kinematical acceptances shown in the last colum of table 10 have been also corrected since they were calculated with a different value for the charm fragmentation fraction than what was used in the rest of the analysis and reported in the text.A misprint was found in table 7: the value in the third column at four rows from the bottom should read 49.8, not 59.8.Finally, one of the authors was missing from the author list: C.