Erratum: Measurement of D*± production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/jhep02(2014)106
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the analysis for our paper on D * production, the beauty contribution was erroneously subtracted twice in the extraction of the reduced cross sections.This affected tables 9 and 10 as well as figures 9 and 10 that are reproduced here in a corrected version.The kinematical acceptances shown in the last colum of table 10 have been also corrected since they were calculated with a different value for the charm fragmentation fraction than what was used in the rest of the analysis and reported in the text.A misprint was found in table 7: the value in the third column at four rows from the bottom should read 49.8, not 59.8.Finally, one of the authors was missing from the author list: C.