“Middle Class” in Science and in Education: Features of Status Position and the Selection Criteria

2014

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.386
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The problem of middle class formation is in the focus of politicians and academic discussion (sociologists, political scientists and economists) in contemporary Kazakhstani society. Assuming that belonging to the middle class is not inherited, but is achieved in the course of life, it is easy to assume that the most important factor of “middle classiness” is education. Higher education is the source of the formation and main guarantor of the preservation and reproduction of the middle class. The more high quality and diversified this system is, the more quality, diverse and sustainable will be the middle class. This article presents some of the main findings of the focus group research on young scientists conducted in 2012 in the cities of Almaty and Astana.