Psychodiagnostics in Student's Understanding, P

2012

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.425
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Psychodiagnostic methods are often used in different kinds of practical psychology. In our opinion, education of psychodiagnostics isn’t limited to the mastery of knowledge, skills and abilities. Studying includes objective knowledge and personal attitude to the subject of study, the unity of the cognitive and affective components. Therefore, the purposes of our research were studying and detection the differences in understanding students - psychologists of psychodiagnostics as a kind of practical activity. Research results let us make the conclusion, that understanding of psychology as theory and practice becomes more differentiated and individual at students to the final year.