Research Note: Governance Indicators Explain Discrepancies in COVID‐19 Data

2020

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/0043820020945683
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is neutral. It does not discriminate: the outbreak affects all countries. Yet, countries with better governance detect and report COVID‐19 cases an average of 34 days earlier than countries with low governance scores. They also report a significantly higher number of cases, and more deaths but lower death‐per‐case ratios. Analyzing the statistical relationship between the good governance indicators devised by the World Bank with data pertaining to COVID‐19 (to May 10, 2020), we present some initial yet strong statistical evidence that countries with higher levels of good governance based on the Worldwide Governance Indicators report more (cases, deaths), report earlier, and are more effective at reducing fatalities. These findings remain robust after controlling for population size, population density, old‐age population, and the number of tourist arrivals. Countries with better governance are more successful in treating the disease and in reducing its deadliness. Good governance matters.