Abstract
In the published article, there was an error in TABLE 1 as published. Row and column percentages were inverted for the age group variable. The corrected TABLE 1 and its caption appear below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.In the published article, there was an error. The row and column percents for vaccine confidence by age were incorrect.A correction has been made to Results, Sociodemographic data and vaccine confidence, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:"Confidence was 47% among providers 36 years old and above and 19% among those 18-26 years old."The corrected sentence appears below:"Confidence was 35% among providers 36 years old and above and 25% among those 18-26 years old."The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.