Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105722
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates surgical outcome and safety results of conventional (OT) versus endoscopic transaxillary gasless thyroidectomies (ET).Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed.The weighted mean differences or the odd ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were examined for surgical outcomes and complications.The results were analysed using fixed-or random-effects models.The heterogeneity was checked by the Cochran Q test and the extent of inconsistency was evaluated by the I 2 statistic.Results: Ten studies and 1597 patients were included.All studies found that ET required longer operative time.Postoperative pain was significantly lower after ET on day 1 and day 7.No statistical difference was found in complication rates.Conclusions: ET has disadvantages such as longer surgery time, but it is a feasible and safe procedure with lower postoperative pain and comparable complication rates to OT.However, good quality prospective randomised studies are necessary to draw firmer conclusions.