Assessing the Value of Market Access from Belt and Road Projects

2019

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-8815
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The present value of market access from the Belt and Road Initiative in Eurasia does not exceed its costs. Many transportation projects are of little value because they fail to create new least-cost paths between large population centers, or because they create redundancy with paths already on the network. If built in isolation, only about one-third of projects provide market access gains. However, considering the proposed new transport infrastructure as a system, the share of projects that provide gains increases to almost two-thirds. International coordination and rigorous project selection allow mutual benefit from the investment program.