A General Primer for Data Harmonization

Scientific Data, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1038/s41597-024-02956-3
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Unprecedented technological advancements in information technology have ushered in a data science revolution, allowing scholars, companies and policy makers to conduct analyses at a scale, speed and granularity previously unimaginable 1 , 2 . However as Elshawi et al . 3 note, “in practice, big data science lives and dies by the data. It mainly rests on the availability of massive datasets, of that there can be no doubt.” From fields as varied as socio-economics 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 to ecology 7 and the ‘Internet of Things’ 8 , data scientists report the lack of big data itself is a major bottleneck in using big data tools. Increasingly, data scientists must first sort through heterogeneous, incongruent, and fragmented datasets before any analyses can be conducted 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 . Such problems with data availability are often exacerbated in emergency situations where real time analyses are often stymied by unevenly documented or unclean data 16 [pg. 358].