A Novel Method for the Determination of the Lateral Dimensions of 2D Rectangular Flakes

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/ma15041560
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

We present a novel method for the determination of the lateral dimensions of thin rectangular flakes, as they exist randomly dispersed in flake composites. Knowledge of flake size and shape is essential for the correct prediction of the mechanical, electrical, thermal and barrier properties of flake composites. The required information is the distribution function of lengths of the lines representing the intersection of flakes with a sectioning plane, as seen in cross-sections of composite samples used in optical or electron microscopy or obtained using tomographic imaging techniques. The key observation is that the major peak of the distribution function coincides with the short dimension S of the flake while a secondary peak corresponds to its long dimension W. These observations are explained using Monte-Carlo simulations, as well as deterministic, geometry-based modeling and probability analysis. Since the strength of the secondary peak diminishes with increasing flake aspect ratio r=W/S, we develop two additional methods for the determination of W. The first finds W from the maximum intersection length; this procedure is justified by computing the relevant probability fields through Monte-Carlo simulations. The second method finds r from the average intersection length and is valid in the range 1