ANTHROPONYMIC BASIS AND LEXICAL CONTINUITY

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-2.1728-7804.08
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

There are names of people who have preserved their ancient identity from ancient Turkic times to the present day. In the article they are considered as elements that make up the “anthroponymic foundations”. On the other hand, these stable anthroponymic components, continuing continuously from century to century, are an indicator of lexical continuity. For example, one component combines different words and creates new names in the form: in ancient times Er Togmysh, in the 15th century Erkutlyk, now Ernur and others, that is, the Er component is stable and flexible to change in accordance with the requirements of each era. Taking into account the peculiarities of this phenomenon when creating anthroponyms, the article compares old and new names, the author concludes that this issue should be taken into account when creating a dictionary of Kazakh names.