THE ACQUISITION POSTPOSITIONS IN TURKIC LANGUAGES WITH THE FORMS OF NOMINATIVE CASES

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-4.1728-7804.16
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Although we refer all types of postpositions to one part of speech, there are large differences between the functions of each of them. It is visible both in terms of lexical meaning and grammatical purpose. This requires sufficient comparison of the types of postpositions with each other. Possessing stable theories developed in connection with the problems of other parts of speech, postpositions are one of the most important and urgent problems for Kazakh linguistics, and in Turkology. Obviously, the solution to the problems of the modern Kazakh language can be achieved only through a comparative study of the Turkic languages. The purpose of comparison of postpositions of Turkic languages is a broader understanding of the activities of postpositions in Kazakh language. It is true that the topic is fully revealed every time when the subject is studied. For this reason, this article is devoted to the problem of nominative cases in Turkic languages.