Specifics of Receiving Evidence in the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.14505//jarle.v10.3(41).04
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The research discusses the specifics of receiving evidence in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The authors of the article analyze the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan related to receiving evidence during the pre-trial investigation of a criminal case. Having conducted a scientific analysis, they have determined the main features of receiving evidence in the criminal procedure. The study has revealed the main types of evidence and provided their characteristics. The authors have considered the procedural order of investigative actions that are based on receiving evidence (interrogation, face-to-face confrontation, presentation for identification, evidence verification and clarification at the scene, investigative experiment). According to the study results, the authors have concluded that the effectiveness of receiving evidence during the pre-trial investigation of a criminal case consists of many objective and subjective factors but the main ones are strict adherence to the corresponding law and professional skills of the official investigating the crime in question.