Problems of Compulsory Alienation of Land for State Needs: A Comparative Analysis of the Legislation of Kazakhstan and Western Countries

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).22
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

A number of new economic, political and social conditions, among which are the updated legal framework for ensuring a market economy and establishing private ownership of land, explain the significant changes in the concept and content of land acquisition in Kazakhstan. The public and the private in the property rights are undoubtedly mutually conditioned, these concepts have not only many intersections, but also clashes that reach their climax in the situation of compulsory turning the private property in the public. This article considers the main theoretical aspects of land seizure under the legislation of foreign countries. Determining the general aim of the legislation, the authors made objective scientific conclusions for improving the state-legal regulation of this area.