Model dynamics of a rammer’s operating element in a soil foundation of a tank for liquid hydrocarbons storage

2018

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1063/1.5051870
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Technology of a local compaction of soil half-spaces, including tank foundations for liquid hydrocarbons storage has a high innovative potential. The use of proposed technology can help to reduce time and material costs to prepare a soil foundation providing its stability in the process of entire lifecycle of a designed facility. Laboratory researches of rammer’s operating element dynamics in a soil foundation were carried out to specify technical and technological parameters and to confirm theoretical data obtained previously by means of a specialized measuring system. The developed technique of performing laboratory researches allowed us to obtain data concerning the influence of free fall height of the rammer’s operating element model on the depth and its penetration velocity into a sandy soil. Laboratory researches showed that in the studied range of free fall heights, the model’s penetration depth value practically linearly depends on the model’s free fall height and grows with the increase of impact velocity of a model in a soil. The increase in the model’s free fall height in its turn leads to an impact time decrease on a soil. The obtained data showed satisfactory convergence of results in theoretical and laboratory researches of model’s velocity in a soil. Discrepancy of theoretical and laboratory results did not exceed 10 %.