Language Purism and Cross-cultural Penetration of Gastronomic Lexicon into the Kazakh Language

2014

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1188
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

One of the attributes of monolingual policy is linguistic purism with its active impact on a language and the processes with the view of an ideal image of language. In such an ideal language, first of all foreign words are exposed to puristic regulation. In Soviet times the sole Russian language conducted foreign words into Kazakh language standardising its semantics, pronunciation and spelling. Such a centralisation of the process of borrowings led to unlimited impact of the Russian language, and flow of foreign lexicon into Kazakh language via only Russian was realised purposefully and deliberately.