Problems of Legislation Systematization in the Sphere of Entrepreneurial Activity

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).05
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The paper looks at the process of systematization of Kazakhstan’s legislation in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity and problems associated with that. Based on comparison with specific regulations of the CIS member countries that observe codified laws in the field of entrepreneurship, the paper focuses on the necessity to accurately forecast the effect exerted by systematization of legislation and choosing its optimal form. The authors ascertain the fact that there is no doctrinal justification for performing systematization works, which results in the unreasonable use of particular public relations while enforcing legal regulation. In this regard, the article proposes to design a doctrine of systematization of the national legislation in the sphere of entrepreneurship. This will exclude redundant elements in the legal regulation system, thereby ensuring its normal functioning.