Comparative Analysis of Decentralization and Power Distribution in Local Self-Government: Kazakhstan and Europe

Khazanah Hukum, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15575/kh.v7i2.45130
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify the key problems of decentralization of power in Kazakhstan, to analyze foreign experience on the example of Poland and Spain, and to formulate specific steps for the implementation of the most successful European practices in Kazakhstan. Poland is interesting as an example of a successful departure from the post-socialist model of decentralization. Spain is chosen as an example of a unitary state with significant local autonomy. The analysis of these countries revealed the advantages of their models, but also found certain problems. Nevertheless, the author believes that their experience can be used to build an effective model of decentralization in the Republic of Kazakhstan and provides specific examples of the implementation of their experience in Kazakhstan. Based on the comparative analysis, the author formulates a number of legal and practical recommendations. The article also addresses institutional constraints and socio-political factors that may affect the adaptability of foreign models to Kazakhstan’s context, emphasizing the importance of gradual, context-sensitive reform.