Spatial interpolation of the latest Quaternary and older Mesozoic sediment soils

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54355/tbus/5.2.2025.0077
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The paper presents a comparison of three methods of interpolation of engineering-geological parameters of soils: Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK), ordinary Kriging, and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW). The initial data were obtained from bored wells on the territory of the residential complex in Astana city. Interpolation was performed along a horizontal section at a depth of 10 m for the parameters: cohesion, modulus of deformation, and friction angle. The results were visualized as heatmaps. Comparative analysis showed that the EBK 3D method provides a higher degree of detail and robustness to insufficient data density compared to IDW and Kriging, making it the most preferred method for 3D modeling of soil mechanical properties.