Some issues of hierarchy in the legislative system of the Republic of Kazakhstan

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54649/2077-9860-2024-3-37-44
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to one of the key problems of the modern theory of law – the hierarchy of normative legal acts. The points of view existing in the legal literature on the concept of hierarchy in positive law are studied. The author comes to the conclusion that it is a relationship of normative legal acts that are located in a certain vertical sequence, in descending order of their legal force, and imply the compliance of acts of each lower level with acts of higher levels. A critical analysis of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Law “On Legal Acts” is carried out. It is established that this Law, while enshrining the hierarchy of normative legal acts, contains controversial and unconstitutional provisions in some of its provisions. Based on the analysis, proposals for improving the Law “On Legal Acts" are developed.