Risk Management in the Public Sector: A Bibliographic Literature Review

The economy strategy and practice, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51176/1997-9967-2024-4-133-145
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This bibliographic literature review investigates the state of risk management in the public sector, focusing on its evolution, current trends, and future directions. The study aims to systematically synthesize the literature, identifying critical areas such as risk governance, resilience, and emergency management as central themes. The methodology involved retrieving data from primary academic sources like Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data was curated using specific keywords, peer-reviewed filters, and a timeframe from 2001 to 2024, ensuring relevancy and high-quality outputs. The review highlights the increasing significance of risk management in the public sector, particularly in response to global challenges such as financial crises and the COVID-19 pandemic. Results reveal an expanding focus on public sector risk management, driven by recent global challenges and the integration of digital technologies. However, notable research gaps persist, particularly in areas such as advanced technology adoption, longitudinal impact studies, and cross-regional comparative analyses. Despite extensive research, gaps remain in integrating advanced technologies, longitudinal studies, and comparative analyses across different regions. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, emphasizing the need for innovative and adaptive risk management strategies to enhance public sector resilience. Future research should address these gaps, promoting resilience in public sector organizations and contributing to a more robust understanding of risk management dynamics in an increasingly uncertain world.