ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO ASSESSMENT OF THE LIFE QUALITY IN GLOBAL PRACTICE

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51579/1563-2415.2024.-4.04
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article analyzes diverse methods intended to assess life quality and indicators across global contexts. The article focuses on such parameters as the Human Development Index (HDI), the Happiness Index, and the Social Progress Index used to assess the population’s well-being. The authors undertake a comparative analysis of the parameters intended to assess life quality, highlighting both such quantitative and qualitative aspects as health, education, personal safety, and environmental factors. Special emphasis is placed on subjective assessments of well-being, emphasizing the significance to engage the general population in the life quality assessment. The article compares Kazakhstan life quality indicators with those of developed countries. It reveals that Kazakhstan falls behind in several key parameters, including life expectancy and GDP per capita. Kazakhstan additionally exhibits encouraging trends in education and in the human development index. Finally, it is concluded that a more detailed assessment of non-material factors is required, and promising directions to develop the methods for assessment of the life quality are proposed.