Ensuring procedural guarantees and the right to a fair trial during the examination of motions to conduct covert investigations

Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi, 2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15332/19090528.9733
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article aims to determine the general principles of guaranteeing human rights and freedoms during the the investigating judge’s examination of motions of pre-trial investigation bodies and prosecutors for permission to conduct covert investigative actions. The subject of the research is the general principle of guaranteeing human rights and freedoms during the consideration of motions to conduct covert investigative actions by investigating judges and the problems of regulation of these issues within criminal procedure legislation. The article uses general scientific and unique research methods, such as comparative, formal, dogmatic, and dialectical. The study results allowed us to determine the areas of improvement of criminal procedural legislation on motions to conduct covert investigative actions. The need for ensuring human rights and freedoms require such actions. Based on the study results, proposals were made to amend the criminal procedure legislation on the motions for investigative actions. In this regard, the incompleteness of regulations requires appropriate amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, as proposed by the authors. It is substantiated that implementing these changes will ensure sustainable and effective law enforcement practice in the field of organization and conduct of covert investigations, reduce inconsistencies, and ensure uniformity of approaches to determining sufficient and necessary grounds for interference in private communication.