Linguistic Interference in Terms of Associate Experiment

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-678x-2020-132-3-123-132
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In language contact the notion “interference” was introduced by U. Weinreich that referredto the influence of one language on another in the speech of bilinguals. Currently, the linguists emphasizea complex and multifaceted nature of interference, as a phenomenon of a two-way interaction that hasboth a negative and positive impact in the bilingualism context. In order to identify linguistic interference,the research method as associative experiment is chosen. The aim of the study is to analyze interferenceappeared while providing the immediate associations on historical terms-realia by graduate students. Thenotion term-realia introduced by A. D. Schweitzer is applied as the proposed stimulus words can be exactlydefined neither historical realia nor terms. The article provides the information on interference, terms andrealia, the position of an associative experiment in general and in Kazakhstani linguistics in particular. Itdiscusses the results of the performed associative experiment with the provided list of words-reactions onstimulus words.