Factors affecting seizure recurrence in the emergency department

Ümit Dölek, Mustafa Gokce, Mehmet Muzaffer İslam, Serdar Özdemir, Gökhan Aksel, Abdullah Algın

Heliyon, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26833
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Information on Emergency Department (ED) follow-up of patients presenting with epileptic seizures is limited. Objectives: It was planned to investigate the factors affecting the recurrence of epileptic seizures in the follow-up of patients presenting to the ED with the complaint of epileptic seizures. Materials and methods: This prospective, observational, single-center study was carried out in an adult population presenting to the ED. The study included patients older than 18 years of age presenting to the ED with the complaint of epileptic seizures. Results: Of the 205 patients included in the study, 68 (33.2%) had seizure recurrence during the 6 h. In the univariable analysis, advanced age, prolonged post-ictal duration, increased seizure duration, generalized tonic clonic seizure, alcohol consumption within past 24 h, hypertension, coronary artery disease, Alzheimer's disease, prior ischemic cerebrovascular disease, low Glascow Coma Scale (GCS), high glucose, high C-Reactive Protein, high phosphorus, low potassium, high blood urea nitrogen, high lactate, increased anion gap, high osmolarity were statistically significant in predicting recurrent seizure recurrence within 6 h. According to the logistic regression, postictal duration, GCS score, and age were independent predictors in our model. The cut-off value of postictal duration in predicting seizure recurrence at the highest sensitivity (66.2%) and specificity (89.8%) was 22.5 min. Conclusion: A prolonged postictal state, low GCS score, advanced age may be an indication of seizure recurrence. Therefore, patients with a long postictal duration, low GCS score, advanced age should be followed up more carefully in terms of recurrent seizures in the ED.