Assessment of Water Regime, Management and Quality Analysis Based on Water Quality Indices – A Case of Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15244/pjoes/171573
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the complex water balance, surface water quality, and water resources management in the Karaganda region. A thorough investigation involved examining 119 lakes and 12 rivers within the region. The study revealed that the annual river flow into the Karaganda lakes and their subsequent outflow from the territory was notably meager, accounting for only 0.935% and 3.031%, respectively, primarily due to the scarcity of water bodies in the region. As for water quality, none of the lakes qualify as “highly suitable water” (>50), necessitating further treatment to make them drinkable. Only a small fraction, 4.6% of the lakes, display water quality scores ranging from 50 to 100, indicating the urgent need for substantial remediation efforts. Additionally, a considerable proportion, 47.7% of the lakes, fell within the water quality range of 100-200, demanding treatment before appropriate use. Furthermore, a noteworthy 11% of the lakes were deemed “unsuitable for drinking” (>300), while 36.7% are classified as “very poor water” in the range of 200-300. In the context of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), the aspects of stakeholder participation, ecosystem protection, and water quality management received the least favorable evaluations, with an average score ranging from 2.4 to 2.8.