THE ACHIEVEMENTS LEVELS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SCIENCE CURRICULUM ON THE SUBSTANCE AND ITS NATURE: AN ANALYSIS THROUGH THE REVISED BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.7884/teke.1339900
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The current study aims to determine knowledge areas and cognitive process dimensions of the Revised Bloom Taxonomy of elementary school student acquisitions in the curriculum course unit of "The Substance and its Nature", as well as how the learning acquisitions are distributed across grade levels. The document review method, regarded to be one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. The acquisitions in the course unit of "The Substance and its Nature" were analyzed according to the Revised Bloom's taxonomy. Accordingly, 52 acquisitions in the course unit of "The Substance and its Nature" were examined by the researchers. The reliability coefficient of the research data was determined as 0.73 which was considered to be enough for research reliability. The results of the study revealed that the most (35 learning acquisitions) acquisitions were emphasized in the conceptual knowledge dimension while the least acquisitions (1 item) was emphasized in the metacognitive knowledge dimension; the study also revealed that the most acquisitions (14 learning acquisitions) were emphasized in the application dimension while the least acquisitions (3 acquisitions) were emphasized in the analysis dimension. In addition, the study also concluded that the acquisitions levels did not display a homogeneous distribution according to grade levels, moreover that the acquisitions within higher-level knowledge dimensions that are to make students' learning more active were not focused enough in the curriculum.