Historical discourse in M. Magauin's «Kipchak Beaute»

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2023ph1/109-116
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

A lot of research has been done in the world around the problem of discourse and is not yet complete. In the works of scholars who speak about historical discourse, they talk about historical facts, historical events, historical writing, historical narrative, historical figures, but do not pay attention to the ways of transmission in the artistic text. This article discusses the features of the category of historical discourse and the interpretation of historical facts in an artistic text. In the interpretation of historical discourse, scholars attach importance to its differences from other discourses. If we consider discourse and text in a very close relationship, it is obvious that there are peculiar features that arise from the fact that artistic discourse and historical discourse intersect in a work of art. In this work, historical records in the artistic text are relatively analyzed within the framework of scientific-historical, socio-political, artistic-historical, and cultural discourses. The influence of a historical and artistic text on historical consciousness is assumed. The article is guided by the works of such scholars as R. Bart, A.V. Lubsky, A.P. Minyar-Belorucheva, V. Plekhanov, A.S. Adilova. Attempts are made to identify the features of historical discourse in Kazakh prose of the postmodern era. In the course of the study, traditional methods of comparison, comparison-analysis, interpretation, semantic, classification are used.