Biological Therapy for Osteoarthritis, Efficacy and Safety: Focus on Monoclonal Antibodies against Nerve Growth Factor and Fibroblast Growth Factor-18

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3889/oamjms.2022.10679
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common chronic progressive musculoskeletal disease, affected cartilage, and surrounded tissues: Subchondral bones, ligaments, and meniscus. Current OA treatment based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen (paracetamol), opioids, and intra-articular corticosteroid injections do not prevent the progression of the disease. Understanding of the pathogenesis of OA with continued structural damage accompanied by chronic pain led to appearance of monoclonal antibodies to fibroblast growth factor-18 (FGF)-18 and anti-nerve growth factor (NGF). This review provides an overview of biological therapy with FGF-18 and anti-NGF for OA. Search process was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar for the following terms: “FGF-18” or “anti-NGF” and “OA,” “monoclonal antibody” and “OA.” Results of the analysis of clinical trials revealed that therapy targeting NGF resulted in significant analgesic effect and functional improvement of joints in OA; however, it was associated with considerable increase in adverse events. The mon\oclonal antibody to FGF-18 demonstrated the structure-modifying effects on cartilage with decrease the cartilage loss and improvement of cartilage thickness. However, further clinical longitudinal studies characterized the risk-benefit are needed to establish safety and efficacy of these medications.