Geospatial characteristics of medical workforce and infrastructure to combat COVID-19 in Kazakhstan

European Journal of Public Health, 2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.023
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Background After cessation of initial quarantine in Kazakhstan, the COVID-19 outbreak peaked in July 2020, imposing dramatic stress on the country's healthcare system. This study was focused on calculation of updated epidemiological characteristics, on evaluation of available medical workforce and infrastructure and the impact of workforce density on infected and dead individuals via ArcGIS platform. Methods The national and local incidence rate (IR), mortality (M) and case-fatality rates (CFR) were calculated along with the population-weighted densities of beds, physicians, general practitioners, resuscitators, nurses and healthcare budget. Associations between the density of different health workers, infected and dead individuals were investigated using Poisson regression. Finally, we constructed vector maps of country regions clustered by IR and CFR to depict the density of beds and those health workers that were significantly associated with infection and death rates. Results There is much heterogeneity between the country regions in terms of CFR (range from 0.28 to 2.57) and IR (range from 1.62 to 12.04), while density of beds was characterized by a relatively greater stability (range from 3.47 to 6.66) and so did density of physicians (range from 0.79 to 2.76) and density of nurses (range from 5.73 to 8.26). Densities of beds, physicians, general practitioners, resuscitators, and nurses have been linked significantly with infection and death rates. Conclusions As COVID-19 epidemic is still far from ending, findings of this study could be of interest for policy makers to formulate an appropriate action plan in the view of possible repeated outbreaks. Key messages