Effective Ways to Pass Exams in Programming Disciplines and Optimize the Process of Analyzing Results. Case Study: Suleyman Demirel University

Ualikhan Sadyk, Zhasdauren Duisebekov, Nauryzbay Sapargali, Altynbek Amirzhanov

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icecco53203.2021.9663777
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article identifies effective ways to pass exams in programming disciplines and how to optimize the process of analyzing results. Also we discussed a list of the problems that we may faced during the exam and their solutions(proposed method). The main part of our project was divided into 4 stages: Analysis of exam results using Google Sheets, Writing a special script(program) that automatically loads images, Detection of plagiarism manifestations using the principles of computer vision, Facial recognition using machine learning algorithms.