Ғылыми жетістіктерді медиа арқылы насихаттау мен түсіндірудің ағартушылық парадигмасы

Herald of journalism, 2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/hj.2020.v55.i1.08
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The propaganda of the achievements of science is framed in special forms and carried out by profes- sional media in collaboration with the scientific community. The appeal to the mass audience of scien- tific material can be seen at the level of submission of the analysis of scientific information. The purpose of this article is to analyze the components of discussion in the context of the repre- sentation of science in a social scientific environment. The author explains the weakness of analytical components with the simplification of content in the information consumption market. The scientific and practical value of the study is to establish the degree of dependence of scientific and educational activities on the level of integration of mass communication and scientific journalism. In the course of the analysis of this topic, along with empirical methods such as description, control and comparison, systematization and study of documents, sociometric methods, theoretical axiomatic approaches based on research by foreign scientists were also used. The main results of a scientific article are: an analysis of the importance of scientific and educational activities for the development of the state and meeting the needs of society; recommendations on the development of mechanisms to stimulate research and increase the status of a scientist. The value of the article. The author claims that for the development of scientific journalism pro- paganda of scientific information alone is not enough. And he comes to the conclusion that scientific innovations and publications should be submitted through the tools of scientific communication, taking into account the characteristics of the audience.