Sacred Monuments of the Turkestan Oasis

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh.2020.v96.i1.17
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this article, the author considers the issue of sacred monuments of the Turkestan oasis. Despitethe well-known not only by archaeologists, but also of the initial community, such large settlementsas Turkestan, Sauran and Sidak, the degree of study of the Turkestan oasis remains inconsistent with itscultural and historical significance. Undoubtedly, the Turkestan region since ancient times was not onlyan economic center, but also a place where the religious worldview and nomads inhabiting the territory,starting from Altai, who worshiped the god Tengri, and the settled population of Turan, worshipedZarathushtra, arose and developed in close interconnection. In this regard, the poet M. Zhumabaev isright, who said that Turkestan is the “gateway of two worlds.” Two types of religion coexisted in oneliving space: the worship of the nomad god Tengri and the religion of settled farmers – Zoroastrianism.The generalization of archaeological material, its use in historical, cultural studies makes it possibleto more fully present the history of life and culture of this sacred region.