Америка Құрама Штаттарының ерекшеліктері Иранға қатысты

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jpcp.2019.v68.i2.026
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study is aimed at studying the policy of us economic sanctions against Iran. The topic became relevant again due to Washington’s withdrawal from the Joint comprehensive action plan (JCAP), which was adopted under Iran’s nuclear program. Such a decision by the US implies a new round of economic sanctions against Iran. The withdrawal from the JCAP raises an important question about the effectiveness of the new sanctions, which will be based on more serious pressure. This situation has given rise to fundamental scientific questions, in particular – what is the reason for the effectiveness of sanctions in some cases and failure in others? In this connection, a certain «target country» makes concessions, and others, despite the huge losses from sanctions, persist in the implementation of its strategic course? In our study, we also take into account the existence of other factors, such as: domestic political consensus, alternative trading partners, etc. In our work we use the case-study method, the main source base are legal and regulatory documents that regulate the policy of introduction and implementation of sanctions.Key words: sanctions, Iran, USA, JCAP, sanctions coalition, UN Security Council.