Miscibility Effects on Performance of Cyclic CO2 Injection in Hysteretic Tight Oil Reservoirs

Yasaman Assef, Pedro Pereira Almao, Peyman Pourafshary

2018

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2118/192734-ms
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Dependency of relative permeability on saturation path during cyclic CO2 injection (CCI) in various operational constraints affects the oil recovery in different ways. A compositional reservoir sector model is built based on the available production data of hydraulically fractured horizontal well in Bakken formation. The work discusses the simulation results of the CCI and investigates the contributions of non-wetting phase's relative permeability hysteresis in oil production below and above the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). A CMG-GEM model is built based on the Bakken geological settings, well production and live oil PVT data. Relative permeability hysteresis model is incorporated within the simulator using the Killough's method. A cyclic CO2 injection (CCI) EOR scheme is designed and implemented in the numerical model. Effects of structural trapping and hysteresis-induced CO2 /gas retardation on oil recovery are studied during CCI in which a strong flow reversals may occur. The results of simulation revealed that in non-hysteretic model, performing cyclic CO2 injection at immiscible (2000psi) and miscible (5000psi) conditions increases the recovery up to 12.8% and 22.64% respectively. Recovered oil after inclusion of relative permeability hysteresis demonstrate major corresponding effects of gas retardation, CO2 trapping and improved water permeability. The results show mole fraction of CO2 invading the reservoir remains constant at miscible condition and is not affected by hysteresis. Yet in hysteretic model, the oil recovery factor is slightly declined as the relative permeability to water is improved. The immiscible-hysteretic model incorporates high residual gas/ CO2 gas saturation at the end of each production (imbibition) cycle which increases gradually with historical gas saturation. CO2 mole fractions in both gas and oil phases are intensely decreased due to hysteresis following by decline in CO2 injectivity. Residual CO2 trapped during early cycles, limits the CO2 extent in reservoir and makes the recovery less efficient. In addition to residual saturation, oil composition varies due to different rates of vaporization and diffusion by CO2 as a result of its uneven distribution in reservoir. We accurately evaluated the efficiency of cyclic CO2 injection in to Bakken tight oil reservoir by incorporating gas-trapping mechanisms in the model. Shortcomings of uncertainties associated with the previous simplified non-hysteretic reservoir models is reduced. Various operational conditions are tested. Our results draw a distinction amongst underlying mechanisms of recovery induced by hysteresis at different miscibility conditions.