Agricultural insurance system: review of the experience of developed countries

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46666/2023-2.2708-9991.15
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This review article is aimed at getting acquainted with the experience of developed countries in insuring the risks of agricultural producers. The creation of a reliable mechanism for their insurance protection is currently one of the aspects of ensuring food security of the republic and a special sphere of state interests. The purpose is to show common insurance practices and countries' policies in dealing with this issue. Methods – in the process of analyzing and evaluating the international level of state support for agricultural insurance, the author used the following research methods: content analysis, which allows to identify the main areas related to state financing of agricultural sector; on the basis of a systematic approach, the degree of state participation in insurance operations was determined; graphical interpretation made it possible to visualize this process on the basis of information received. Results – the article presents aspects of state investment of insurance premiums in agricultural sector. The author identifies and graphically displays three main categories of state assistance in agricultural insurance. The results of the review can be used to conduct research in all regions of the republic. Conclusions – world experience shows that subsidizing insurance payments is the most effective way to support small and medium-sized businesses and ensure economic sustainability of the industry, reduce negative consequences, including loss of income in production of products associated with the onset of adverse natural events. A coordinated and strategic approach to managing the insurance market, government support and effective mitigation methods are important, while direct government reimbursements are ineffective in the long run and do not contribute to the prevention of risk situations.