“Strictness is a Virtue” – Social Determination of Authoritarian Parenting and Political Authoritarianism

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1163/15718182-31020005
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Parenting and children’s rights are intimately related. The parenting styles characterised by low responsiveness to children’s needs, including authoritarian-paternalistic and those of neglect, are harmful to child’s development and contradict the main principles of children’s rights. The slow development of children’s rights in Kazakhstan and, in general, in the Eurasian1 context, derives from the social norms justifying authoritarian-paternalistic parenting, specifically, the widespread belief that “strictness is a virtue”. This article proposes and discusses the concepts of “social determination of authoritarian parenting” and “social determination of political authoritarianism”. The former concept denotes an embodiment of social norms that shape the parenting styles with low responsiveness to children’s needs, especially authoritarian-paternalistic. The latter suggests that authoritarianism is a product of social and cultural contexts, including parenting. These concepts, being mutually supportive phenomena, create the vicious circle of the persistency of authoritarianism in both politics and in child-rearing.