IoT Network Intrusion Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist54437.2022.9945769
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The approaches that are directly suited for the implementation of the process of detecting anomalies in data are discussed in this article, and a comparison of the most widely used ones is carried out using the following criteria: the speed of implementation and the model's data needs. As a consequence, it can be stated that determining the quality of a model at the emission detection stage is challenging, and as a result, it must be examined at the final step (through subsequent analysis of the identified anomalies of various methods). Combinations of various strategies are the most often utilized and accurate procedures, as shown by experience.